Grants
We look for public programs that match the shape of the work, including federal small-business research programs such as SBIR and STTR, and state or industry programs. An application is a separate piece of work. An audit is not an award.
Audits
We review a company and write down what looks like IP, what may be unused or already promised away, and where a grant, a funding path, or a patent conversation might fit. The findings are a commercial reading, not a legal opinion.
The scope is agreed before the review starts. It can cover one product or a wider slice of the company. The length follows the amount of material.
You leave with a note in ordinary language:
What a review can surface
We point at the fit. We do not award money, prepare claims, or file anything.
We look for public programs that match the shape of the work, including federal small-business research programs such as SBIR and STTR, and state or industry programs. An application is a separate piece of work. An audit is not an award.
Some work fits a grant. Some fits another funding path. We name the ones that appear relevant and the reason they appear relevant. We do not promise capital, and we do not take a tax position.
We flag inventions that may be worth a patent conversation. A patent agent or patent attorney decides whether something can be patented and prepares any filing. We do not practice before the patent office.
How it moves
What it makes, what it is building, and the question you want answered.
Which products, records, and contracts are in. We do not start from a blank request to “look at everything.”
We read the material against IP, grants, funding, and patent candidates.
You decide the next step: a license conversation, a funding lead, counsel, or nothing further.
A few sentences on the company are enough to start.